February 6, 2008
When the South Texas Project (the nuclear plant near Bay City) was being built in the 1970s and 1980s one of its most persistent opponents was San Antonio lawyer Lanny Sinkin.
As the voice for groups like Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power Inc. and South Texas Cancellation Campaign he badgered regulators and the plant owners at every chance, getting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow arguments in its formal hearings on the competence of the owner, HL&P, and its contractors, Bechtel and Ebasco.
Tom "Smitty" Smith, the current head of the Texas office of Public Citizen, says Sinkin played a big part in getting reports on the poor quality of construction at the plant to see the light of day. That led to a number of improvements at the plant.
"He is just in the wrong forum with the wrong material and the wrong information," said Maurice Axelrad of Washington, D.C. in a May 1985 Chronicle article.
Sinkin now lives in Hawaii but he was back in Texas this week to help activists fire up their campaign against the planned expansion at the plant. He attended the public hearings in Bay City on Tuesday, sitting in a corner of the room typing away on a laptop.
Sinkin said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s application process has changed significantly from the 1970s and 1980s. The process allowing the public to intervene in the process is much more difficult he said, with a shorter time window for groups to sign up as interested parties (Feb. 25) and greater specificity required in their complaints.
"There’s no way I could do today what we did back then," Sinkin said Tuesday.
He heads back to Hawaii soon but, likely to the chagrin of the plant operators, will be back later this year.
Our colleagues at the San Antonio Express-News (a fellow Hearst newspaper) also covered the event.
This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. SEED Coalition is making this article available in our efforts to advance understanding of ecological sustainability, human rights, economic democracy and social justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a "fair use" of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.